Sign in or 

“We still have the law on our side. The National Construction Safety Team Act requires NIST to establish the likely technical cause of the building failure. It also requires a public report including the analysis demonstrating the likely cause of failure. Upon reading the final NCSTAR reports issued in November 2008 regarding WTC 7, I could not find a complete analysis that proved the NIST hypothesis was correct. Instead I found numerous inconsistencies and unfinished business. Read the article if you are curious, and keep the NCSTAR reports handy for reference.”Brookman is one of over 40 structural engineers who have signed the AE911Truth petition calling for a truly independent investigation of the events of 9/11, with emphasis on the destruction of the WTC Towers and WTC building 7. He is also one of the interviewees in the article,29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High–Rises on 9/11. For a broader book–length exposé on WTC 7 see also David Ray Griffin’sThe Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center7 — Why the Final Official Report about 9/11 is Unscientific and False.Brookman received his M.S. in Structural Engineering (1986) from the University of California at Davis, following a B.S. in Civil Engineering from the same school in 1984. He has over 23 years experience in structural analysis, design, evaluation and rehabilitation of buildings in northern California.READ MORE AT AE911TRUTH.ORG
http://static.wetpaint.com/img/bg/1.png?v=20111214172750
bgiltner |
Latest page update: made by bgiltner
, May 24 2010, 5:27 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by bgiltner
2 words added 1 word deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|