FOX Local 5 'broadcast' CGI contradicts FOX News angle and 'live' CGI

By ewing2001



Correction of wrong assumption and new findings of contradiction
June 27, 2006

Up until 4 months ago, i assumed that FOX Local5 (NYC) picked up
the very same LIVE BROADCAST from FOX News (Cable Channel), which decided
to air the synchronized W-ABC7 live feed.
More logically, i assumed, as also all other News Cable Channels did, they picked up their feed from the local station.

But this was wrong. The local station of FOX5 had their own "live filmed" and "live broadcasted" footage.

As uncropped footage (including 2 zooms and ongoing timestamp) proves (see 06/26 screenshot photo),FOX LOCAL 5 showed at the VERY SAME TIME a contradictive incoming flight angle of alleged real aircraft which we classified as a CGI.
Positions of both Towers clearly proves this:
ABC7/FOX NEWS shows North Tower covering the South Tower, while FOX LOCAL has BOTH TOWERS NEXT TO EACH OTHER.
However the aircraft silhouette (also contradicting in shape) still comes from a straight right angle.

This 2nd "LIVE" CGI triggers therefore another LIVE smoking gun:
If camera position (incl. the tower position) changed, then how was FOX LOCAL able to 'show' a contradictive incoming flight angle in opposite to FOX NEWS, who broadcasted live the ABC7 (local feed)?

While i have to correct my assumption now because i logically concluded, that the FOX LOCAL footage must have been aired later (after 9:03), it now contradicts even more.

It also still shows this other 'smoking gun' of the double-zoom:

The uncropped footage shows how far away the helicopter must have been, which proves even more the geographical contradiction and a illogical violation of standard camera procedures, once a new real 'object' arrives on the screen.

Here is again the flight path LIVE contradiction (as proven by position of towers):



UPDATE

Here is an explanation, where a confusion, a wrong collection of memory and my wrong assumption must have been based on:
At around 8:55 AM EST (as proven with split screen live footage of 911chronology.com), almost 8 minutes before the second hit, it was actually CNN, but not FOX NEWS, who decided to synch a feed from FOX LOCAL ("Good Day NY") !:



That brings us to more questions:

If the WESCAM helicopter feed was 'synched' as broadcast for ABC, NBC and CNN at the same time, why did FOX NEWS decide to synch to ABC7 as well instead of using an own local FOX 5 LOCAL FEED, which was already available for CNN since 8 minutes?

Why did CNN also not synch to FOX LOCAL again?

Most important however, who was in charge in all these helicopters?

And how can FOX NEWS explain away clear live broadcast contradictions and multiple live broadcast irregularities compared with the FOX LOCAL 'feed'?

========================================================

Uncropped long distance, (not-live) shown footage proves fakery (06/26)

By ewing2001

How "Opposition" of 9/11 TV fakery evidence reacts... (06/26):


see also "blogger brigade" at 911blogger.com

Mon Jun-26-06

All of the "hologram" and "CGI Planes" threads . . . .?
Anyone who posits this theory is straight up DIS-INFO direct from the shadow government. Nothing more and nothing less..."

The visual evidence of NON-LIVE footage however proves i.e.:

1)
no impact sound at time of CGI 'attack' of South Tower,
no crumbling walls at time of impact:
YOU TUBE

2)
2 actors used as an off-voice for alleged amateur footage which shows
a CGI showing a black silhouette impostering as an alleged real aircraft,
though the walls also do not crumble and wings do not break apart:
YOU TUBE, "Witness Reactions"

3)
2 other actors ("holy cow") used as an off-voice for alleged amateur footage,
which shows a completely different CGI with different behavior
at time of vanishing behind the North Tower:
BodyAtomic, "my window", formerly another source

4)
The NON-LIVE footage provided by an unidentified helicopter and camera operator team for FOX, proves clearly that it was shot from a distance of apprx. 5-6 miles away.
It wasn't explained yet, why this camera team did violate 2 existential camera rules:
Showing more of the alleged incoming real aircraft from the right side as an EWS (Extreme Wide Shot) or ECU (Extreme Close up), to show more details and flight route:
"Loose Change Saltergate Video"
You see also that after the zoom from 5-6 miles away, a logo is obscuring the CGI black silhouette, apparently on purpose to hide more details.
(see pictures above)
What you also logically realize is that the black silhouette is still coming from a straight right angle, which contradicts the LIVE Footage from ABC7:




(see also 9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world and "Compare the 9/11 TV Fraud (Updated w/6 flashies)